The analysis and speculation in this article regarding the tiered logic of the 189 invitation mechanism refer to trend analysis carried out by authoritative migration agencies and law firms in the industry based on FOI documents and historical invitation data. The content of this page is unofficial inference, intended to provide reference, and does not constitute policy basis. The final occupation tiers and invitation strategy are subject to the official release of the Australian Department of Home Affairs.
1) https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/working-in-australia/skillselect/invitation-rounds
Ethos Migration Lawyers:
https://ethosmigration.com.au/understanding-the-occupation-tier-system-for-sc189-invitations/
2) Growmore Immigration:
https://www.growmore.one/new-subclass-189-visa-selection-model-tiers-occupation-ceilings-and-invitation-limits-explained/
In the 189 skilled migration invitations, the Australian Department of Home Affairs has gradually shown a tiered priority logic based on occupation shortage levels. The industry generally summarises it as a four-tier structure of Tier 1–Tier 4. Different occupations may affect their invitation speed and probability according to shortage level ranking. SCEM has also analysed and summarised this based on authoritative information and data, hoping it will be helpful to everyone.
Note: This article focuses on the analysis of occupation priority trends in the actual invitations of 189 skilled migration. If you need to understand the basic definition, application requirements and overall process of the 189 skilled migration visa, you may refer to our 189 skilled migration visa introduction:
In the 189 skilled migration system, according to the logic oriented by occupation shortage levels, its “priority invitation” model appears in the four-tier structure as follows:
One-sentence summary: Medical professional talents = Tier 1 core occupations, with the highest priority and the fastest invitation speed.
Main characteristics:
Typical occupations:
One-sentence summary: This category covers public system occupations prioritised in Australia’s Direction 105, and the occupation directions highly overlap with the current long-term shortage list.
Main characteristics:
Typical occupations:
One-sentence summary: Tier 3 = normal occupation pool, mainly including occupations with stable demand but not belonging to extreme shortage, while the number of applicants is not so large as to be overloaded.
Main characteristics: This category actually maintains the diversity of the migration system, and the invitation speed is medium.
Typical occupations:
One-sentence summary: The priority is the lowest, and applicants queue with a large number of competitors. It belongs to occupations where the number of applicants has far exceeded demand for many years.
Main characteristics:
Typical occupations:
While analysing and summarising, we also noticed that some overseas discussions often classify the occupation of Chef into a lower-priority occupation pool. However, given that the demand for this occupation varies greatly across different states and different sub-directions, we hold reservations about directly placing it into Tier 4. This is specially noted for everyone’s reference.
| Tier | Occupation Type | Invitation Thinking | Invitation Pace |
| Tier 1 | Medical professional talents | Scarce talents | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Extremely fast |
| Tier 2 | Education, social work, nursing, big-health majors | Key shortage filling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Relatively fast |
| Tier 3 | Engineering and diversified majors | Maintaining occupation diversity | ⭐⭐⭐ Medium |
| Tier 4 | Accounting and ICT categories | Too many applicants | ⭐ Slowest |
The analysis and inference involved in this article are compiled based on existing public data and industry trends. It should be noted that different applicants have significant differences in professional background, experience and goals, and actual migration pathways have obvious individual characteristics.